“A Family Decision”: Kremlin Claims Billionaires Voluntarily Offered War Funds to Budget

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov has presented the official version of the closed-door meeting between Vladimir Putin and big business held on March 26. According to the Kremlin, the idea of multi-billion ruble contributions to the budget for war needs (officially “state tasks”) was not mandated from above but was a manifestation of a patriotic impulse from one of the participants. Key Points from the Kremlin: Analytical Summary: The attempt to pass off multi-billion ruble levies as a “family decision” is an exercise in political camouflage designed to hide the transition to a mobilization economy based on “donations.” Legalizing the “Tribute”: Reports from Financial Times and The Bell that Suleiman Kerimov has already confirmed a contribution of 100 billion rubles move the discussion from “patriotism” to concrete figures. The “voluntary” narrative is necessary for the Kremlin to avoid legal accusations of forced expropriation, which could complicate the lives of oligarchs in international courts. A Signal to Others: The phrase about businesses that “started in the 90s and are linked to the state” is a direct reminder to everyone on the Forbes list: your assets are not your unconditional property. It is a “lease,” and the rent in 2026 is the direct financing of military needs. Those who do not make a “family decision” voluntarily risk a review of privatization results. Mutual Responsibility: Dragging major businessmen into direct financing of the deficit budget creates a situation of mutual complicity. By making such a contribution, an oligarch finally burns bridges with the West, becoming a direct accomplice in financing hostilities. For the Kremlin, this is the most effective way to guarantee elite loyalty during a prolonged war.

“Worst Performance in 25 Years”: Russian Restaurants Face Nearly 40% Collapse in Footfall

The Russian restaurant industry entered a deep recession in early 2026. According to market participants and trade associations, the current decline in footfall and revenue is unprecedented over the last quarter-century. Even the fast-food segment, traditionally considered crisis-resistant, is showing double-digit drops. Key Figures of the Restaurant Crisis: Analytical Summary: The situation in the restaurant sector is a diagnosis of the true state of the Russian consumer’s wallet, which stands in radical contrast to optimistic official statistics. The “Empty Table” Effect: Restaurants are the first to take the hit when the population enters austerity mode. A 40% drop in footfall means that dining out has ceased to be a routine leisure activity and has turned into an excessive luxury. This indicates that the accumulated financial reserves of households have been exhausted. Statistical Gap: The sharp dissonance between Rosstat’s figures (+7.4% income) and the restaurateurs’ reality (-20% in transactions) speaks to high inflation in services and food products, which “eats up” any nominal wage increases. People aren’t just saving—they are switching to a survivalist consumption model. Threat of Mass Closures: The restaurant business operates on thin margins and is extremely sensitive to turnover. The current collapse in traffic will inevitably lead to a wave of bankruptcies in the second quarter of 2026. If even market leaders like “Teremok” are reporting critical declines, it means imminent exit for small and medium-sized establishments. The market faces a massive “cleansing,” and cities will face vacant commercial spaces.

“Everyone Will Have to Tighten Their Belts”: Russian Government Warns of Potential Collapse of 60 Coal Companies and 600 Billion Ruble Losses

The Russian coal industry is experiencing its deepest crisis since the 1990s. According to the Ministry of Energy, the sector is facing unprecedented losses that could reach 576 billion rubles in 2026. The situation is aggravated by the fact that the government does not intend to extend tax benefits, which are set to expire on April 30. Scale of the Catastrophe in Figures: Analytical Summary: Russia’s coal industry has found itself in a “perfect storm,” where external sanctions pressure has coincided with internal structural problems and a tight monetary policy. Collapse of the Eastern Pivot: Hopes that China would become an eternal and bottomless consumer of Russian coal have not materialized. Beijing is systematically reducing imports, prioritizing its own production and cheaper suppliers from Southeast Asia. For the RF, this means the loss of its last major market following the closure of Europe. Financial Strangulation: The combination of exorbitant interest rates (making debt servicing difficult) and the cancellation of tax holidays from May 2026 will be a death sentence for many companies. The government is effectively signaling that it will no longer rescue coal miners at the budget’s expense. Social Time Bomb: Coal is not just a raw material; it represents 30 single-industry towns and 150,000 jobs. The liquidation of 60 companies is not merely the bankruptcy of legal entities, but a risk of creating depressed zones and social unrest in Kuzbass and other mining regions. The industry has entered a phase of “forced dieting,” which will end in total disappearance for one in every three enterprises.

Billions in losses and mass layoffs: the failure of the “MyOffice” model

The Russian office software developer New Cloud Technologies (brand MyOffice) is initiating large-scale layoffs. The company’s CEO, Vyacheslav Zakorzhevsky, in a letter to employees dated March 23, 2026, acknowledged “serious financial difficulties” and the need for a radical business restructuring. Financial indicators and the scale of the crisis: Analysis and Conclusion: The collapse of a flagship of Russian software is a signal that the resource of administrative import substitution is exhausted. High development costs combined with a limited domestic market and the impossibility of Western expansion have created a financial trap. Even with state involvement and sanction pressure, Russian corporate users often prefer “grey” schemes for using Western software or free Open Source solutions, making the business model of paid domestic analogs structurally unprofitable without constant state subsidies.

Russia Begins Selling Gold Reserves to Plug Budget Holes — First Time Since 2002

Russian authorities have turned to radical measures to save the federal budget. For the first time in nearly a quarter-century, the Central Bank has begun the physical sale of gold from its reserves. The reason is a catastrophic deficit that exceeded 15 trillion rubles between 2022 and 2025, and grew by another 3.5 trillion in the first two months of 2026 alone. Gold Sale Facts: From “Virtual” Deals to Real Ones:Until recently, gold operations within the National Wealth Fund (NWF) were merely an accounting formality: the Ministry of Finance “sold” gold to the Central Bank, simply moving the metal from one state pocket to another. Now, however, the Central Bank has entered the market with physical bullion (likely domestic or in “friendly” countries), converting strategic reserves into liquid cash. Analytical Summary: The transition of the Central Bank to the physical sale of gold is a clear signal of the critical exhaustion of “currency resources.” The Yuan Deadlock: It appears that the liquid portion of reserves in Chinese yuan has reached a dangerous threshold. The regulator is afraid to “burn through” the remaining Chinese currency, as it is the only tool left to influence the ruble’s exchange rate. Gold has become the last liquid asset that can be directed toward military spending, which has reached levels not seen since the Soviet era. End of the Accumulation Era: The decade spent turning Russia into a “gold fortress” has officially ended. By starting the sale of physical bullion, the Kremlin admits that current oil and gas revenues no longer cover the appetite of the war machine. Risk of “Eating the Future”: If the deficit pace continues (3.5 trillion in two months), the gold reserve could melt away before our eyes. This undermines the long-term stability of the ruble and strips the country of its last strategic reserve, which remained untouched even during the most challenging periods of the last 20 years.